Peak ARC
Research
Shockwave therapy has been studied extensively since the 1990s for a variety of chronic tendon, ligament, and soft tissue conditions. Across the scientific literature, the most commonly reported outcomes include reductions in pain, improvements in physical function, and enhanced quality of life.
Many studies have also demonstrated increased participation in work, sports, and everyday activities following treatment. In addition, imaging studies suggest that shockwave therapy may stimulate biological changes associated with tissue healing, including increased blood flow and improved tendon health.
While not every study has found statistically significant improvements, research consistently shows that shockwave therapy is a safe, low-risk treatment option, with very few reported complications and no evidence that treatment worsens the underlying condition (except in extremely rare scenarios).
Important Note: Individual results vary. The success of treatment depends on factors such as the condition being treated, how long symptoms have been present, the severity of the injury, and individual healing capacity. A thorough assessment is essential to determine whether shockwave therapy is the right option for you.
Case Specific Research
Note: We can treat many conditions - some of which may not be specifically listed below. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions
 Plantar Fascia - Click to read article |  Hip Pain - Click to read article |  Low Back Pain - Click to read article |
|---|---|---|
 Knee Pain - Click to read article |  Rotator Cuff - Click to read article |  Achilles Tendon - Click to read article |
 Hand Arthritis - Click to read article |  Overactive Bladder/Interstitial Cystitis - Click to read article |  Urinary Incontinence - Click to read article |
 Pelvic Pain in Men - Click to read article |  Total Knee Replacement - Click to read article |
General Research
Biological effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in tendons: A systematic review
A systematic review is a type of research study that carefully collects and analyzes all of the available scientific evidence on a specific topic. Instead of relying on a single study, researchers review a high number of studies to determine what the overall body of evidence shows.
Think of it as a "study of studies." Researchers use a structured process to find, evaluate, and compare research to identify consistent findings and reduce bias.
They are considered one of the highest levels of scientific evidence and are often used to guide healthcare recommendations and treatment decisions.
Effectiveness and Safety of Shockwave Therapy in Tendinopathies
This is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to different groups—typically a treatment group and a comparison (control) group. Think of it as a fair test where chance decides who receives the treatment and who does not, reducing the risk of bias.
RCTs are considered one of the strongest ways to evaluate a treatment because they help answer the question: Did the treatment actually cause the improvement?
By comparing outcomes between groups, researchers can better determine whether a treatment is effective, safe, and clinically meaningful.
Effect of Shockwave Treatment for Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Narrative Review
A narrative review is a summary of research on a particular topic written by experts in the field. Instead of following a strict process to find and analyze every available study, the authors select and discuss research they believe is most relevant to explain a subject, treatment, or trend.
Think of it as an expert-guided overview of the existing research. Narrative reviews can be helpful for understanding complex topics, learning about new developments, and gaining clinical insights from experienced professionals.
Recent Advances in Shockwave Therapy for Musculoskeletal and Soft-Tissue Disorders
This is a literature review which is a summary and discussion of previously published research on a specific topic. Rather than conducting a new study, the authors examine existing studies to identify common findings, areas of agreement, and gaps in the current evidence.
Think of it as a "big-picture overview" of what researchers have learned about a topic over time. Literature reviews can help readers understand the current state of knowledge without having to read dozens of individual studies themselves.
Literature reviews provide valuable context and can help explain how research findings fit together. They are often used to introduce topics, summarize emerging evidence, and identify areas where additional research is needed.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy mechanisms in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine
A description of Shockwave's interstitial and extracellular responses.
Suggesting that it produced many beneficial effects such as: pain relief, vascularization, protein biosynthesis, cell proliferation, neuro and chondroprotection, and destruction of calcium deposits in musculoskeletal structures.
